Dropbox Can Now Automatically Sync Your Android Photos (And It Has More Up Its Sleeve)

dropboxshot

Last year, Dropbox raised a whopping $ 250 million funding round at a valuation in the ballpark of $ 4 billion. The raise had been rumored for months so it didn’t come as a huge surprise, but it still raised plenty of eyebrows. Because while Dropbox is totally awesome (I use it every day), at this point people see it as a convenient way to sync their files between computers — which it already does pretty well. So what’s all the money for?

Today, we’re getting our first taste of what’s next, and what cofounder and CEO Drew Houston calls Dropbox’s mission to solve all of the “hidden problems” that people have with technology, many of which we’ve simply become accustomed to dealing with.

Their first solution to one of these hidden problems? Helping you keep all of your photos, from all of your devices, in one place. And to get things started, they’re launching a new version of their Desktop and Android clients that’ll automatically upload your photos to your Dropbox account. Snap a few photos on your phone, and, without having to hook up any wires, they’ll be on your computer within a minute or two.

I know what you’re thinking, because it’s the first thing I said to CEO Drew Houston and Product Manager Aseem Sood: “err, don’t iCloud and Google+ already let you do this?”

I’m pretty sure they saw it coming.

The first thing they pointed out is that there are a lot of people out there who aren’t using either of those services. Most Dropbox users aren’t using Macs at all, so iCloud is out of the question, and Google+ is still just getting started (yes, the service has lots of users signed up, but how many of them are using it and have the app installed on their phone?).

Dropbox also does a couple of things that Google+ doesn’t: for one, it’ll automatically sync the full-sized version of your images — Google+ sync will downscale images to 2048px at their longest edge. And Dropbox can also sync any photos it detects on your PC: if you plug in a camera or SD card into your computer and it detects images, you’ll have the option of automatically adding them to your Dropbox folder.

This new feature could potentially eat up a significant amount of space in your Dropbox folder, so Dropbox will also be gradually boosting the limit for free users from 2GB to 5GB (they won’t do this all at once — as you use the photo feature, you’ll be able to gradually accrue more free storage). Houston explains that the goal of this feature is to make life easier for people, not to get them to upgrade to larger Dropbox storage limits, which is why they’re offering the additional free space.

It sounds great, and I’ll be enabling it immediately, but there are still some obvious areas for improvement. Images that are synced to your Dropbox account are placed in a special Photos folder, but they’re just sorted in chronological order — there isn’t any intelligence around event or location detection, for example. Another potential issue is that Dropbox doesn’t offer any tools for managing or editing these photos, so it’ll be up to you to drag them into iPhoto or another photo editing app (the best solution will likely be to make your Dropbox folder your default image folder).

Houston agrees that they’re just beginning to scratch the surface of what’s possible here, so I’m sure we’ll see improvements soon. Oh, and don’t worry iOS users — Dropbox will be updating its app to include this functionality soon as well.

It’s worth nothing that, while this is the first time Dropbox has baked this functionality into its official app, it’s been possible to do the same thing on Android using third-party applications that take advantage of the Dropbox API. Of course, the official app has a much bigger install base.



Posted in Techno | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Crunch: True Shred

1555

Here are some recent posts from TechCrunch Gadgets:

Tabber Adds An LED Light Show To Any Guitar

The Tesla Bricking Story? It’s Nonsense

Here’s The Epic Borderlands 2 Launch Trailer

UltraViolet Hits 800k Digital Media Locker Accounts, Added 50k In The Last Six Weeks

Asus To Transformer Owners: “Here Is Your Unlocked Bootloader. Happy Now?”



Posted in Techno | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

OnLive Adds “Cloud-Accelerated Browsing” To Its Streaming-Desktop Stable

yodawg

You’re probably familiar with OnLive, the company that made its mark by streaming brand new console and PC games to whatever devices could support a high-bandwidth video stream. Many doubted its technology to begin with (including yours truly – Is OnLive OnCrack?) but they’ve more or less delivered on their promises, and have also been expanding the services they offer. Most recently they introduced OnLive Desktop, which streamed a Windows 7 desktop to your iPad.

That was mainly focused on productivity – Office apps and such. Now they’ve added web browsing to the table. Yes, they will stream live video of a web browser running in a datacenter to your device, which almost certainly already has a web browser.

If that sounds crazy, it’s probably because it kind of is. But maybe it’s crazy like a fox. Their accelerated browser is a full-on desktop browser running on a gigabit connection. It can load files and display them to you in the video stream faster than you can load them on your own device. And of course it has Flash. It’s certainly more capable than, say, Safari on iPad, but is it really better?

The problem is that the average consumption experience doesn’t really benefit from being streamed. Flash is rarely critical to use from a tablet (though it can be nice), and big attachments are often virtualized already – big PDFs and video files can be viewed or streamed online without a tedious download process. The few cases where a window into a high-speed but generic browser is better than the built-in one are probably overshadowed by the inevitable downsides of interacting with a virtual, video desktop: lag and occasional poor image quality.

You’ll have to shell out to give it a try; the iOS app is free and you can access productivity tools (if they have the spare bandwidth for you), but for the browser and desktop you’ll need to drop $ 5 per month. Soon you’ll also be able to pay $ 10 per month for extra space and custom desktop apps. It’s the beginning of something cool, but at the moment it seems a hard sell.



Posted in Techno | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Google’s Diversifying Display Ad Business Could Pass Facebook’s, eMarketer Guesses

Screen Shot 2012-02-22 at 9.45.05 AM

Research firm eMarketer has puts together a few interesting data points that show Google doing better in display ads than you might have realized. That is, by growing this business across properties and networks that it at some point acquired — YouTube, DoubleClick, and mobile (AdMob) — it’s set to pass Facebook’s own display business.

The social network had the highest online ad sales of any company in the US last year, at $ 1.73 billion dollars. But that was a mere $ 200 million or so above Google. This year, eMarketer expects a similar story, with Facebook bringing in $ 2.58 billion versus Google’s $ 2.54 billion. Things change in 2013 and 2014, further off from what the data can tell us accurately.

The firm thinks Facebook’s growth rate is going to plummet after this year, down to 13% in 2014, while Google’s is going to continue at nearly 50% through 2013 and still at nearly 30% in 2014.

I’m not ready to bet on that.

The estimates are based on publicly available documents from both companies, and other sources. On Google’s side, its earnings from last quarter indicated that its non-search ads were on track to reach $ 5 billion a year, or 12% of its total business. This is double what it brought in over the previous five quarters. YouTube is getting better and better at monetizing videos, DoubleClick is a market leader in online display ads, and AdMob has a strong position across mobile platforms. I agree it makes sense to be bullish about this part of Google’s business.

On Facebook’s side, eMarketer’s original estimate for its revenue had been $ 2.01 billion in the US, but Facebook’s S-1 filing proved this to be around 15% over what it actually was. The projections here read as if eMarketer feels burned by being so positive about last year. But the report manages to qualify itself in the event that Facebook revenue does in fact start to grow more quickly, by noting the potential benefits of newer advertising features like Sponsored Stories.

That’s the thing. Facebook’s ad business is still young, the company is fine-tuning all sorts of interesting features, and there are other ways that the business could see new growth, for example if Facebook launches a web-wide ad network that competes with DoubleClick and the rest of the online ad industry. 2013 and 2014 are a long ways off, and other numbers like traffic are looking fine.



Posted in Techno | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment